![]() “If you read the SSLeay license carefully, it says among other things you cannot distribute this code under any other license,” he said. ![]() Salz cited several reasons for seeking a new license for OpenSSL. Now there are at least 150 contributing and making pull requests, he said. ![]() Rich Salz, a member of the OpenSSL development team and senior architect at Akamai Technologies, in a phone interview with The Register, said that in the year before Heartbleed, two people were responsible for almost all of the changes being incorporated into OpenSSL. A portion of that funding transformed OpenSSL into something more than the shoe-string operation it had been for years. The planned licensing change comes with the endorsement of Intel and Oracle, among the companies that pledged $3.9 million to the Linux Foundation as atonement. “My worry is that the rights of the authors are being trampled upon, and they are only being given one choice of license which appears to be driven by a secret agreement between big corporations, Linux Foundation, lawyers, and such,” he explained in an interview with The Register via phone and email.įor years, OpenSSL went largely unappreciated, until the Heartbleed vulnerability surfaced in 2014 and shamed the large companies that depend on the software for online security to contribute funds and code. Theo De Raadt, founder of OpenBSD, a contributor to OpenSSL, and creator of a LibreSSL – forked from OpenSSL in 2014 – expressed dissatisfaction with the relicensing campaign in a mailing list post, criticizing OpenSSL for failing to consult its community of authors. Those driving the project announced plans to shift to a new license in 2015 and now the thousand or so people who have contributed code over the years have started receiving email messages asking them to grant permission to relicense their contributions under the Apache Software License, version 2. The software is licensed under the OpenSSL License, which includes its own terms and those dating back to the preceding SSLeay license. But its effort to obtain permission to rewrite contributors’ rights runs the risk of alienating the community that sustains it. The OpenSSL project, possibly the most widely used open-source cryptographic software, has a license to kill – specifically its own.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |